• 16 Posts
  • 2.5K Comments
Joined 3 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年8月15日

help-circle





  • Not an american but personally i would most definitely prefer an absolute fuckwad with little self control in charge than an evil mastermind entity hellbent on squeezing me for every cent.

    The former is too stupid not to ruin his lever of power, which would cause the system to decentralize and/or contribute to said fuckwad’s downfall. The latter employs a huge amount of people specifically trained to maintain and increase the amount of profits extracted while maintaining their stranglehold.


  • Perhaps you should start watching trek instead of commenting on it from a distance, you know, so you know what you are taking about.

    The federation (in the TNG era which i would count as the most beloved and accepted by fans) is a post scarcity society, the populations indeed do have full and free access to replication technology, which also solves the waste problem you suggest since replicated goods can also be reclaimed by the devices. Make whatever you need, use it, vanish the leftovers when youre done.

    So indeed people are beyond our concepts of material need and property. Individuals may also indulge in commerce if they are of the mercantile inclination, nobody cares, but any citizen can acquire any material resource required or desired in their lives regardless, and for free.






  • Make > use > reuse > remake > recycle

    I read this as:

    • Create commodity
    • Consume/use commodity until obsolete
    • Use leftover commodity for possible secondary function (old clothes can be fixed up or used in making different clothing)
    • Repurpose leftover commodity (old clothes could also be used as rags)
    • recycle (dispose in a way that allow some or all of the resources to be reclaimed)

    Though i agree that the wording is weird and required my deliberately positive interpretation.