

You pay for those because you can’t watch them for free without ads by using an extension or something like that. They’re not “convenient enough to bypass” for you.


You pay for those because you can’t watch them for free without ads by using an extension or something like that. They’re not “convenient enough to bypass” for you.


Make you pay for “what has historically been provided in exchange for a fee or advertisement for the past 17 years, one year after the service launched”.
You’ll do what you want of course, but that fake outrage and righteousness is just pitiful. Just stop pretending and own that you just don’t want to pay for it as long as you’ll be able to.


Anything to justify your stance. The experience is better without ads, but people just don’t want to pay.


Or even a no contest (if allowed by the judge on a serious case like that.)
Yeah, it’s easy to dismiss manual jobs as “dumb stuff for non educated people”, but when we got off our high horses we realize we’re bigots and that they deserve any and all forms of respect.


This is AskLemmy, not go on a rant and spread whatever narrative you feel spreading and add a question mark at the end.


So that argument was used as a reason to attack them the next day. What about the other 40 days since?


So let’s advocate for the bigger of the two terrorist states to continue their terrorist actions until the smaller terrorist state surrenders!


Dissolving “a country that’s unequivocally commiting a genocide and trying to both dissolve a country and eradicate it’s population” shouldn’t be controversial.


FFS no, were good. Let us deal with our shits ourselves. It’s not like the US absolutism of the 1st amendment and the like is a good example to follow.


Thanks for confirming you don’t know what you’re talking about. Take care.


And how many hundreds of millions of users were they handling, how many auxiliary services were provided in the SDK that they shared multiple platform, how many bad agents were trying to use their platform to infect millions of users, to run scams, etc., etc.
Keeping the stigma/taboo alive doesn’t help the situation.
“but she’s in Canada”
Only works for US teens though
Ya, I got sum there and included the frame and all without cropping. Sorry
Haha. I know it breaches protocol, but I had to let you know I did get it.


That’s suspicious.
I have a theory…
Are you sure they weren’t hitting on you, placing nudes on the background and handing you their phone so they knew you had access to their phone number (during the transfer) so they were willing to pay the price of switching phone to get a callback?
I seriously can’t think of another reason than that to put nudes as a freaking background…


It’s not recoverable and permanently compromised if ever it is.
Also, even if someone was trying to impersonate you, you wouldn’t know it unless the recipient told you (which could also be done today with DMARCs, albeit at a domain level not an email level)


But since Hamas attacked a music festival first it’s ok right?
Or maybe it’s ok because Hamas hides.in tunnels under an hospital?
I need to find a good reason to say it’s ok otherwise it means my government isn’t doing what it should…
Copium copium.