FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years agoI know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards.hexbear.netimagemessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up1151arrow-down11
arrow-up1150arrow-down1imageI know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards.hexbear.netFunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square15linkfedilink
minus-squareUlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·2 years agoIf subtext is for cowards, what is cop-talk passive language?
minus-squareFunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 years agoThe negation of the negation is distinct from the original phenomenon, so the negation of text being subtext and the negation of subtext being cop passive language implies that it is actually “domtext”
minus-squarefrauddogg [null/void, undecided]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 years ago…Damn! Y’know you on some quantum shit right now
If subtext is for cowards, what is cop-talk passive language?
The negation of the negation is distinct from the original phenomenon, so the negation of text being subtext and the negation of subtext being cop passive language implies that it is actually “domtext”
…Damn! Y’know you on some quantum shit right now