Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 years ago[meme] Trains are 100000x easier to electrify and automate than cars, so why does everyone keep talking about electric and driverless cars?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square568linkfedilinkarrow-up12.24Karrow-down1157
arrow-up12.08Karrow-down1image[meme] Trains are 100000x easier to electrify and automate than cars, so why does everyone keep talking about electric and driverless cars?lemmy.worldFried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 years agomessage-square568linkfedilink
minus-squareStovetop@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-27 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareBraBraBra@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 years agoIf the infrastructure exists for cars, it can exist for trains. 1 bus > 25 cars. Or how many ever it seats.
minus-squareBraBraBra@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 years agoBtw, I’m pretty sure places that are that remote rely on planes. Some parts of alaska are like that if I’m remembering correctly.
![[meme] Trains are 100000x easier to electrify and automate than cars, so why does everyone keep talking about electric and driverless cars?](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/11c37658-7c32-4cc2-b12c-6ced348bd09d.png){kind=link}
deleted by creator
If the infrastructure exists for cars, it can exist for trains.
1 bus > 25 cars. Or how many ever it seats.
Btw, I’m pretty sure places that are that remote rely on planes. Some parts of alaska are like that if I’m remembering correctly.