iamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 5 months agoIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...imagemessage-square164linkfedilinkarrow-up1693arrow-down184
arrow-up1609arrow-down1imageIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...iamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 5 months agomessage-square164linkfedilink
minus-squareFrankDeath@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agohttps://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoYes, if you do silly things with JS, you generally get silly results instead of TypeErrors. I wouldn’t say that makes the language bad. It makes the language resilient to bad programming, which you’d generally want in the case of web pages.
https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
Yes, if you do silly things with JS, you generally get silly results instead of TypeErrors. I wouldn’t say that makes the language bad. It makes the language resilient to bad programming, which you’d generally want in the case of web pages.