• paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    I don’t think Brady was as heavily involved in the cheating. I weigh Spygate much more heavily than deflate gate, and that seemed much more like something driven by a front office than players. The players may have known, may have even been shown the tapes, but I highly doubt Brady was actually in the stands with a camera at any point, and I also doubt he had the authority to command people to do it on his behalf (maybe later in his career, but not then).

    Deflategate was cheating, but it seems such a smaller and more minor violation that just got blown up because it happened to be Brady and Belichik. If any other QB did that they might get a 1-gane suspension, max.

    If Brady was someone a mythical cheating mastermind, it would have been way harder to translate that to a new team. Different coaches, trainers, equipment personnel, security guards, janitors, etc.

    Belichik needed both Brady and cheating to win. Or at least someone better than Mac Jones. Bill Belichik as the GM was pretty terrible.

    • edcasting@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      ‌ So you just decided arbitrarily that Brady’s “cheating” doesn’t matter and that he somehow couldn’t easily deflate footballs in Tampa Bay, but that despite assuming that Brady might’ve benefited from having the defensive signals from other teams, this doesn’t count as “heavily involved” in regards to what you deem the worse of the scandals…
       See, this is why I say this is all just a convenient excuse to stay in denial. People are just unilaterally cherry picking their facts to fit the narrative, arbitrarily choosing what counts as cheating or who holds the blame, getting themselves into a pretzel to rationalize selective outrage… It literally relies on whatever you assume happened, and you choosing the interpretation you want.