Infrapink@thebrainbin.org to Not The Onion@lemmy.world · 7 days agoOpenAI Representatives Are Going to Critics' Houses With Threats and Demandsfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square33linkfedilinkarrow-up1275arrow-down111file-textcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up1264arrow-down1external-linkOpenAI Representatives Are Going to Critics' Houses With Threats and Demandsfuturism.comInfrapink@thebrainbin.org to Not The Onion@lemmy.world · 7 days agomessage-square33linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
A man who worked an AI watchdog reveals how OpenAI representatives suddenly showed up at his door step, demanding documents.
minus-squareM0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·6 days agoOdd, I just kinda did do that. The process here is very clearly being used to try put a cooling effect on criticism, and the anti-SLAP rules only work if someone can afford to pay for litigation (another example of a flawed system).
minus-squareMiddleAgesModem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·19 minutes ago Odd, I just kinda did do that. The process here is very clearly being used to try put a cooling effect on criticism That’s convenient for your argument isn’t it? What you’re saying is that OpenAI is not allowed to use the justice system as it exists. If OpenAI had their documents subpoenaed, you’d have the exact opposite reaction.
minus-squarescarabic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·6 days agoYou didn’t argue it at all, you just asserted it, and now you’re just asserting the motivation.
minus-squareM0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·6 days agoYes, and to expand on my argument may I point out my functioning eyes.
minus-squareMiddleAgesModem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 minutes agoWell your eyes must suck then because they’re causing you to make unfounded, ignorant and truly embarrassing statements.
Odd, I just kinda did do that. The process here is very clearly being used to try put a cooling effect on criticism, and the anti-SLAP rules only work if someone can afford to pay for litigation (another example of a flawed system).
That’s convenient for your argument isn’t it? What you’re saying is that OpenAI is not allowed to use the justice system as it exists.
If OpenAI had their documents subpoenaed, you’d have the exact opposite reaction.
You didn’t argue it at all, you just asserted it, and now you’re just asserting the motivation.
Yes, and to expand on my argument may I point out my functioning eyes.
Well your eyes must suck then because they’re causing you to make unfounded, ignorant and truly embarrassing statements.