Context: a thread about what instance to reccomend.
Turns out talking about .ml users excusing Russian war crimes and Iranian crimes against humanity is not OK in c/asklemmy. Nor is mocking defederated Hexbears on alt accounts who literally admit to sealioning XD
Seems a tale older than FidoNet, we must remember we’re one take a ModGod dislikes away from GOODBYE!
I didn’t adress the russian part because there is no excuses to defend Russian invasion.
And I asked you what was your exact comment so I know if you simply condemned the Iranian regime or you also supported the west intervension bexause there is people who want to bomb Iran for those human right abuses
A different comment, but still a clear example of the second:
For context, which is often key, that is a several months old comment about Iran’s nuclear weaponry sites getting exploded.
You showed no context showing that they removed your comment simply for calling out Iranian human right abuses
I’m not sure what context I can provide exactly, my comments were wiped and there wasn’t comment in the modlog to explain what rule I broke.
I’m just running on the assumption the mod didn’t agree and so banned and insta unbanned me, and I think I responded to you up the thread summarizing my first comment that was removed. If there’s something else I can give you, let me know.
Ah I get you, my original post was something along the lines of ‘where can I subscribe to the newsletter to learn more about how Russia has a right to invade their neighbors and how Iran murdering and maiming their citizens is actually OK? Never knew being anti-west made you ontologically good until I heard from a .ml’
Queue a line of .ml posters exhaustingly arguing semantics instead the point!
Not once asked for more bombs and death in the world.