• Meeech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    That assumes the employee is working 24/7 which can’t be done.

    When accounting for a normal 40 hour week you get a much different number. 2884.62/40 hours per week = $72.12 a hour

    • figjam@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Large corporations see roles and not individual people. There needs to be [guard] in [location] which costs 150k.

      If you think a security guard is paid $72 an hour I’m going to come work for you.

      • Meeech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        What I’m getting at is that your logic is assuming the guard lives at the data center and is always on duty. Now forgive me because I’m completely ignorant to this topic, but I don’t think that would be the case here. It would probably be the same as other jobs with scheduled hourly shifts. High profile areas will generally pay higher due to the importance of what needs to be secured.

        • JakenVeina@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          No, it assumes that there will be A guard always on duty, and that cost is $150,000. In reality that $150,000 is probably 3 or more different guards, with rotating shifts, each making about $17/hr.

          • Meeech@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Your original example was breaking down pay by dividing 168 hours. That’s 24 * 7. How is that not implying 24/7? Regardless, I stated my ignorance on the matter so I’ll accept that I must be wrong on this matter and just let this die. Hope y’all have a great rest of your day.