No, no — give them rope to hang themselves with.

Imagine deleting your comments instead of acknowledging you’re wrong.

Sincerely, fuck you — you’ve earned your tag and I’ll be making sure to remind everyone of what a cunt you are.

You must love Jujutsu Kaisen

It’s incredible that I have two people in this thread who simultaneously decide that the OP is an unreliable narrator and completely write in their own stories for why this actually isn’t unhealthy.

It’s incredible, truly — the delusion I mean.

Her track record as a poor leader doesn’t disqualify her from being a poor leader?

Sincerely, fuck off.

Edit: you’ve earned the tag ‘Genuinely Incompetent’. Truth be told, I could have been crueler.

I understand your comment, I reject it.

I’m talking about when she was the AG — I should have said, and I acknowledge this was my mistake, I hold both her and Newsom accountable for the absolute lack of accountability in the California DOJ. I didn’t think I had to point out that I was talking about her time as AG, but here we are.

No, but this is California we’re talking about so I’m not sure much has changed since Trump became president.

I literally quoted their TL;DR.

What you’re trying to suggest is essentially saying ‘Yeah it’s totally fine to think you love your dog more than you love your girlfriend, it’s 100% healthy to treat your human girlfriend like you would an animal’.

Dude, what the fuck, I know Trump is president but let’s not speedrun our way back to the 40’s that quickly. This is either fake or the definition of unhealthy.

I just do the things to her that I do to my dog, because I love my dog more.

Ah, I see — we’re calling this healthy now.

I do not subscribe to any of the petty reasons why conservatives dislike Harris.

I worked for the DOJ under her. My reasons for disliking her are grounded in reason. I have never worked in a bigger shitshow department than when I worked for the DOJ under Harris.

Concepts of a plan, as it were

The reasons people voted for Trump are racism and greed. Anything else is just lip service they tell themselves to make themselves feel better after their massive fuckup.

Edit: because let’s be clear, everyone told the fucking dipshits what would happen as a result of a Trump presidency. Everything they said came true, the magats blamed Biden, and then they voted for Trump again.

I am really struggling not to use the word ret*rds when talking about them.

Uh, no, more like making a post and then signing your message with a username/real name.

Edit: truth be told though, I don’t know if there was a way to actually have a ‘username’ on 4chan — someone else will have to answer that. Didn’t spend a large amount of time on the platform.

You seemingly sweat more when you’ve shaven because the hair isn’t there to absorb the moisture.

My theory is that hair provides more surface area for evaporation, but I have only anecdotal evidence.

I don’t know where you got this from, but I promise you that you are sweating the exact same amount before and after you shave. This is simply how human body odor works, hair traps smells. If you are used to your smells, you are used to your smells. The same goes for your girlfriend.

Unless you just happen to live in a place that’s cold and sweat less, which I suppose is possible.

Edit: the word is hygroscopic, your hair is hygroscopic.

I don’t think virtue signaling is accurate here.

I think it is directly signaling that you are mentally deficient, and this has been true the entire time /b/ has existed.

Basically, on an online forum like 4chan, using a username or real name instead of just going with the flow like almost everyone else.

As for why they attach f*g to literally any and every designation besides anon, it’s 4chan. Actually, many dots were connected for me as far as the disgusting nature of 4chan when I realized Epstein was very active on /pol/. He was also very active on /u/ (Yuri) but most people aren’t ready for that conversation, people really don’t like it when you imply porn is bad here.

No, that I can’t answer — it would depend entirely on the level of fallout and where it happens to land.

You would need to be able to perfectly, and I mean perfectly, predict weather months in advance in order to prepare accordingly.

The reaility is that for an AI, or rather an AGI, to make the choice to launch nukes would require them to reach a point where they accept the potential loss of their own ‘life’ in exchange for whatever value a nuclear war might hold. I struggle to believe that a ‘true’ AGI would make that choice. There are far too many variables to control in comparison to a biological agent, one that likely would not affect a machine.

Now, a modern AI making that choice? Absolutely possible, the things are fucking crazy with literally no concept of what life is.

I repeat, radiation absolutely fucks electronic components. I am not talking about an emp, I am talking about radiation.

What?