

I know as much as you do about it. All that either of us know is what we directly read in the article. And it has a clear bias and motive imo.
I never said they shouldn’t seek funding. I’m calling out the article for being an obvious vehicle to solicit funding. They already published it. I don’t opposed that. I oppose the method and hype train mentality exhibited.
It’s true, the idea isn’t utterly original, but I don’t think it’s meritless. But I’m not going to read into something like this article and fantasize this contraption as the ultimate solution to water scarcity in deficient locals.
Please don’t mistake my skepticism for willful ignorance. But please do get off of your high horse








Aw come on. You can put more effort into a rebuttlal than that. I used all those fancy words to explain my opinion. Don’t just cop out and fold like that. It’s lazy and trollish behavior.