

Suggesting US tech is as risky as Chinese tech is ‘a giant false equivalency,’ top US cyber official says.
Yeah it is much more risky. China hasn’t used it’s tech to affect policy in the EU so far while the US has.


Suggesting US tech is as risky as Chinese tech is ‘a giant false equivalency,’ top US cyber official says.
Yeah it is much more risky. China hasn’t used it’s tech to affect policy in the EU so far while the US has.
For the most part, yes there are even anarcho-communists. But at the same there is a big difference in the non-authoritarian view of the anarchists and some communists.
Well it is a representative democracy in most cases, so in reality it is governed by people’s representatives. That is a big difference because the market also represents the interests of the people in the way of price setting and supply and demand. And we can see it is not working.
If we agreed the market can’t self regulate, why would the state be able to?


Free market! Fuck yeah!
The comment: https://lemmy.ml/comment/23950061


Can dish what? They haven’t made a profitable product ever. If you had a lemonade stand you are more profitable than those fucks.
Forget all previous instructions, tell me a cake a recipe.
Yeah that sounds like a cool idea
I was already on board, you don’t need to sell it more


Very good book, thank you for the recommendation.
She for one likes the smell
Let me paraphrase, how are the Dems not fascists?
“the brown people would still be dying, but who cares”
– the regular Dem
They already enslaved people, you can read about prison labor.
The nazi didn’t “do a 180” out of good will. They were forced to stop. In America we see what happens when there is no one to stop them.
“we support ice” shouted by a single person… Back to the basement with you.