Yes, then. This has slop vibes all over it.

Link the actual paper as published in a peer reviewed journal.

Is that graph AI generated?

I wish journalists would include stuff like this (because it is sadly often left out of research, particularly when people have an agenda).

Does this study account for the obvious: poor people eat more UPFs and are more depressed?

Did the study do anything to account for alternative causes? It seems immediately obvious to me that economic status could influence both weed use and academic achievement.

IIRC, third cousin is pretty close, n times removed is just generation gap. I mean it makes little difference, genetically, but being that close to a royal within written history is probably a good indication of generational wealth.

People who believe (because they’ve been lead to believe) that driverless cars are safe still have a right to live without injury. Being credulous or fooled doesn’t remove your rights.

Seems to be polynomial growth, actually: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_power_law

Which makes more sense, but still; a 44 tonne lorry is doing 44^4 times as much damage as a 1 tonne car, which is 3.7 million times as much.

I assume the exponential doesn’t hold up for some reason, maybe because of the amount of wheels they have. Otherwise it would seem that an LGV (maximum weight to cross borders in the EU is 44tonnes), would deal 16^44 times as much damage as a normal car, which is a large enough ratio that I think it would be safe to say that either the road would be immediately obliterated under any vehicle of that weight or normal cars do so little damage that it would be misleading to represent it as anything other than zero.

To be clear: I’m not trying to say you’re wrong. There’s another option for the growth rate, given the two data points given, that probably makes more sense. I just found it amusing to entertain the thought and go through the process.

Given how much heavier freight vehicles are than any passenger car, what percentage of road damage do they cause, given the damage seems to grow at O(n^16) ?

IIRC, their existing stuff is a white labelled mullvad, which is based in Sweden and, as far as I know, generally considered a good or even the best VPN for privacy.

I’m honestly not sure; I expect it varies from person to person. I certainly find it difficult to look at either way around.

Full-contrast black-on-white is also a common eye strain and/or migraine trigger.

Far Away by Jose Gonzalez.

We’re still European, no?

I don’t like that this is an ad. Really undercuts the seriousness of the message.

Could well be that that was the effective treatment.

You might also try basically any essential oil mildly diluted. I’ve had a lot of luck with lavender oil.

(I think aphids are just tiny so they get engulfed in whatever you spray on them, essential oils are actually relatively nasty chemicals that just smell nice)

Going back to my childhood: reading comprehension way ahead of my age group. You can’t play old jrpgs and point-and-click adventures without reading a lot.

Not sure how true it would be today with everything being voiced.

In my experience they’ve significantly tailed off over the past year, exponential growth would mean the amount they get better per unit time increases over time. What has gotten better is our ability to run the same level of things on cheaper hardware with less power, again just in my limited experience. (Also this is not the definition of exponential growth, just a property of it. Polynomial growth has the same property)