In practoce though, that’s not how fidiciary duty works. That’s really just an excuse. As long as there is any reason any business decision has any reasonable argument that it might help the company, it is legal as far as fidiciary duty is concerned. And, given anything could hypothetically build beneficial consumer sentiment, it’s about as toothless as perjury charges.

Throw it on the pile of reasons landlords shouldn’t exist

The forms of fraud you are listing are election fraud, which IS obviously very common (and according to the Supreme Court, very legal now)

This is just conspiricism with no basis. There has never been any evidence of any noteworthy amount of voter fraud in US history. Even the Heritage Foundation has marked only ~1000 votes as POTENTIALLY fraudulent out of billions (less than 0.0001%)

Because not everyone is capable of getting an ID. For one, they’re not free, so requiring one is effectively a voting tax, preventing the poorest of our community members from having a say in our government.

Two, even if they were free monetarily, they’re not free to get in terms of time. If you’re working 16 hours a day at 2 jobs for example, when are you supposed to take time to go to the DMV to get an ID or license? This is particularly hard for, again, poorer people who have to work multiple jobs to stay afloat.

Three, there really is no problem that requiring an ID at a polling station solves. Of the BILLIONS of votes in the Heritage Foundation’s (a VERY conservative thinktank, the one Trump tapped for most of his judicial nominations) database recording voter fraud events, they have a little more than 1000 instances of SUSPECTED voter fraud. That’s about 0.0001% of votes cast are suspected to be fraudulent by the people trying to push the policy to correct the problem.

Meanwhile, these laws prevent more people from voting legally each election than have ever been suspected of voting fraudulantly since we have been keeping records. They are doing research to find the specific forms of IDs the people who vote against them tend to have or not have, and explicitly targetting them to ensure as few votes against them are allowed to be cast. It is an inheirently undemocratic solution to a problem which the proponents of the policy openly state does not exist.

There are also more than two sexes, so even on it’s face the argument fails. Intersex people exist.

You’re assuming beating your dick to Waluigi railing Luigi in the ass is sinful

I wonder what repo this is. Could this be an effort to combat bad ai issue report spam?

Literally my fucking GOAT

Why is COVID (2.2%) below Suicide (2.1%) on the graph on the left? Everything else is in decending order of occurance

I just keep my smartwatch off the internet

Mafuba

Very true tbh. Beans and rice in tomato sauce is extremely cheap. Bread is the most expensive thing I buy regularly.

I would bet my mortgage thousands of times over that she won’t see an indictment, much less a conviction or prison time

I’d love to see the pensions investments into the alcohol, tobacco, and gambling industries. After all, they return far better than Isreali bonds ever could. If they’re judging their investments solely on the return, they should have the vast majority of their investments in these very safe, high return, but sin taxed industries, right? Or does that excuse only apply when we are talking about the Isreali governments sins…

The installation instructions literally have a section for transitioning from standard Ljneage to L4M: https://github.com/lineageos4microg/l4m-wiki/wiki/Installation

What’s the context to this?

Right, because there are only a few options here, and none of them are good for Schumer: He was aware of the plan to vote for the bill, and couldn’t do anything to stop it. He is an incompetent and ineffective leader of the party in the Senate.

He was aware of the plan, and agreed with it or spearheaded it: He, as leader of the Democrats in the Senate, wanted this and cosigned it, leaving him to blame (spoilers, but this is actually what happened)

He was unaware of 8 separate Democrats colluding behind his back to vote for a Republican bill to end a MASSIVELY politically advantageous situation for the Democrats. Again, he is incompetent and should be fired.

Of course, it’s pretty plain to see that their agreement was spearheaded by lobbied interests threatening to pull money out if they didn’t cave, given the massive advantage the shutdown have the Dems. No reasonable Dem would have voted to end it otherwise. And obviously, the Minority Leader would be involved heavily in those discussions.

Pretty sure this was LITERALLY a 2 and a Half Men bit after Charlie Sheen left

Had to take time out of my workday to verify: Very real