Sure but anthropogenic climate change is an issue of greenhouse gas accumulation rather than a lack of oxygen, no? Rather than there being too many people literally just using too much oxygen.
- 1 Post
- 7 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: July 8th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Are we concerned about the amount of oxygen available now?
benjiman@lemmy.worldto
Fuck Cars@lemmy.world•Fort Wayne police sergeant fined $35.50 for fatally striking pedestrian in crosswalkEnglish
27·3 years agoFor $35 it’d honestly be less insulting if they didn’t fine him at all.
benjiman@lemmy.worldto
Terrible Estate Agent Photos@feddit.uk•For those who love to watch themselves eat
1·3 years agoThis picture makes my head hurt
benjiman@lemmy.worldto
Memes@lemmy.ml•Lemmy might, MIGHT have a small bias towards the left
2·3 years agoAssuming that the education could be free, why wouldn’t you expect people to train as surgeons?
benjiman@lemmy.worldto
World News@lemmy.world•Don't overstate 1.5 degrees C threat, new IPCC head saysEnglish
3·3 years agoEuropean homes generally are optimized for the cold and not the heat
cries in British

Thanks, I’d never really considered the impacts climate change would have on oxygen. I looked into this a bit and it seems to also be the case that rising ocean temperatures also reduce the capacity of the water to hold dissolved oxygen, which causes a nasty feedback loop.
So while there’s not an immediate risk of atmospheric oxygen concentration dropping by any significant amount, there is a real concern of oxygen concentrations in the oceans dropping pretty drastically. This then accelerates climate change even further and could have longer term effects on atmospheric levels as well.