

Slavery is not being denied the ability to earn wages.
Slavery is being denied the ability to save.


Slavery is not being denied the ability to earn wages.
Slavery is being denied the ability to save.


Now ban them immediately and make it so their destruction isn’t considered a crime.


Moving the Forest Service to Utah is like moving the Coast Guard to Utah.


The USA is NOT a superpower.
It’s just a country with a big military that is using up its advantages really quickly and is making its citizens hate it.
The most important aspect of a superpower is that its citizens have to be in support of it, or at the very least, the government needs to be stable.
The United States does not have a stable government, and will not for any kind of forseeable future.


I’m colorblind, but I’m curious to know what is being represented here.
You didn’t have confidence before? I’m definitely not seeing anything for you to be lacking confidence in…


It’s crazy when I buy a $3 product on some site and the site offers me a 3-year warranty for $20. No thanks, bro. I’ll take my chances that I won’t have to replace the item seven times within the next three years.


Gender ideology is what right-wingers do, not what supporters of transgender people do.


At this point, it’s been pretty well proven that the idea of intellectual property does a lot more harm just in general than any problem it supposedly solves.
You want to end all of the monopolies? Take away the idea that ideas can be owned.
And all of these companies that routinely buy off elections? They can’t compete with free.
All of these medicines which cost ten million dollars per pill? People would LOVE to pay $5 per pill for them.
The idea of intellectual property does NOT spur innovation. That claim is laughable. What it DOES spur is the creation of the least valuable workable solution, and then the smallest possible incremental improvement whenever the patent or copyright is about to run out. It literally PREVENTS useful technologies from coming to market, and prevents the poor(who would rush into many job markets if there weren’t literal IP restrictions on them) from working in many cases.
There is literally limitless energy available to us. But as long as the people in charge benefit from people believing the supply is limited, people will be made to believe the supply is limited.


Yes, but the US is a huge, profitable market.
“Thank God the Titanic was built so tough, or that iceberg we just hit might be a problem…”
Without blocking browser fingerprinting, they can identify your specific computer regardless of how many different accounts you use or how many different browsers you use.
Correct browser fingerprinting blocking does NOT block attempts to fingerprint. It just generates false information for their fingerprint detection tools.


The company is literally building death camps, installing statues of genociders, is run by the RICH pedophiles(who have ZERO interest in seeing pedophiles prosecuted), and is using Palantir and Flock cameras to monitor everything, meanwhile having secret police disappear people and just openly slaughter them.
The United States Government is well beyond deserving the benefit of the doubt.

And what a surprise; they’re talking about solving it by cutting the needs of the poor instead of the luxuries of the rich.


Trump’s always advocated for inserting heads where they aren’t wanted.


Unfortunately, the negative effects from companies like Google turning in completely ethical people for doing things that should be completely legal and uncontroversial will do drastically more damage than the positive effects from said companies turning in the poorest of the pedophiles.


Okay, so the new superpowers in the world are apparently Iran and Ukraine.
Who knew?


Israel.
Are.
Not.
The.
Good.
Guys.


I forget-- Am I supposed to upvote based on whether it’s a worthwhile story, or based on the fact that it’s such a good thing to have happened?
The U.S. Government never passes up an opportunity to declare people to be property.
Children are not property. Children are people.
The exact same logic that adults can speak toward children in ways that are abusive because those adults are legally allowed to speak is exactly the logic that would say that adults can sexually abuse children because those adults are legally allowed to have sex.
No. When your actions have victims, you are violating those victims’ rights.
And that is true REGARDLESS of what this court of “justices” claims.
The people on this court don’t even know what the word “justice” means, and they have no business being called it.