• CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    Collapse the solar and radiators, orient for reduced drag, maybe shield the front? Then boost to a higher orbit. Aim for… 20 years?

    • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      But why? If the upkeep is getting overwhelming and no commercial operators want the parts, that’s just creating a ticking time bomb out of sentimentality. I’d rather clean up space by bringing it down.

      • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        Humans are sentimental. You can park it in an empty orbit, i don’t think that’d be an issue. It’ll just be more expensive.

  • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    They have already done this study, though.

    https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/iss-deorbit-analysis-summary.pdf?emrc=667c97a20241b

    Raising to even a 100 year safe orbit needs 20,000kg of propellant and a new vehicle that doesn’t exist. I suppose that’s solvable with enough budget. It would also need attitude control while raising the orbit for debris avoidance. And a crew. Getting crew to dock at 650km is prohibitive for a mix of reasons. And, even if you solve those issues, the station becomes a dead bomb in the parking orbit that could create a massive debris cloud if struck.