

Passengers: 4 > 2 > 1 > 4
So that’s better, I guess?


Passengers: 4 > 2 > 1 > 4
So that’s better, I guess?


But it does nod in a direction and wiggle its eyebrows suggestively.
Milch oder Kaffee zuerst in die Schüssel?

Bayern hat’s nicht so mit Bildung.


Geh bitte, als würden die CxU oder der Söder jemals zugeben sich geirrt zu haben.


Hey now, there’s no reason to insult potatoes like that.
Came in with the '23 fuck spez wave. When they started training LLMs with reddit data. Edited all my posts and closed the account.
February starting on a Sunday also means two Friday 13th in a row, except in leap years.


Ja. Und der Dampf stinkt nicht so fies. Gibt auch Filter durch die man ausatmen kann, so dass der Geruch minimal ist.


Facebook and Insta next!


I know they’re not synonymous. But at some point someone left the marketing monkeys in charge of communication.
My point is that our current “AI” is inadequate at what we’re told is its purpose and should it ever become adequate (which the current architecture shows no sign of being capable) we’re in a lot of trouble because then we’ll have no way to control an intelligence vastly superior to our own.
So our current position on that journey is bad and the stated destination is undesirable, so it would be in our best interest to stop walking.


It’s quite bad at what we’re told it’s supposed to do (producing reliably correct responses), hallucinating up to 40% of the time.
It’s also quite bad at not doing what it’s not supposed to. Meaning the “guardrails” that are supposed to prevent it from giving harmful information can usually be circumvented by rephrasing the prompt or some form of “social” engineering.
And on top of all that we don’t actually understand how they work in a fundamental level. We don’t know how LLMs “reason” and there’s every reason to assume they don’t actually understand what they’re saying. Any attempt to have the LLM explain its reasoning is of course for naught, as the same logic applies. It just makes up something that approximately sounds like a suitable line of reasoning.
Even for comparatively trivial networks, like the ones used for written number recognition, that we can visualise entirely, it’s difficult to tell how the conclusion is reached. Some neurons seem to detect certain patterns, others seem to be just noise.


Vinaigrette is better anyway.
Und dann rumflennen, dass so viele böse Ausländer kein deutsch sprechen.