mehrshad

Watching this closely. They’ve been looking to shed the pacifist overtones for the last couple years. Don’t be surprised if this becomes a trend everywhere but the U.S.

Even if democrats in America maintained a shoo-in two term POTUS, supermajority in both chambers, 40 governors, and 7-2 on SCOTUS, they’d spend so much time pre-optimizing and planning and bickering over special interests that they’d lose the control before any change could occur. Whereas the GOP asks “why change the constitution, when we can just wholesale ignore it?”

ASDW FTW

Did we just skip the “Run blindfolded into oncoming traffic TikTok challenge” between tide pods and choking, or have I not been paying enough attention?

Section 230 needs a paddlin’ now that it’s clear big tech controls every platform and every corner, and Trust and Safety is nothing more than a weak tea after-the-fact press release slash out-of-court settlement promising “changes”.

Yes, because “debates” will help after virtually every amendment between 1-11, 13-16, and 18 has been wantonly violated in the course of exactly one year to the day, with everything else but 21 in the crosshairs.

Debates are the opiates of the privileged naïve. Direct action is the only remedy.

To clarify, this was Canadian patients. One would imagine that number being higher stateside. Good luck getting that data.

Have you tried a spouse?

Seriously though, Structured does this for me now with some tweaking: https://structured.app/